Placement Workspace · Expiring program
Loss runs, the SOV summary and the expiring program, on illustrative data
The expiring program. Five years of losses per line with the loss ratio, the SOV summary and the expiring program by line, carrier, limit, retention and premium (illustrative data).

An underwriter reading a submission is doing one thing: pricing uncertainty. Every blank field, every loss run valued six months ago, every exposure that moved without an explanation is uncertainty, and uncertainty is priced conservatively or declined. A market-ready submission is simply one that leaves the underwriter nothing to guess.

In short

  • Five things decide it: the applicant, exposures, the property schedule, five years of losses and the expiring program.
  • Gaps should be stated, not hidden. An open item the broker names is a conversation; one the underwriter finds is a reason to doubt the rest.
  • Freshness matters as much as completeness — a loss run valued more than 90 days ago and an SOV more than a year old both read as stale.

What an underwriter needs, line by line

LineExposures that rate itWhat gets queried
Commercial propertyTotal insured value from the SOVConstruction, year built, sprinklers, values that add up, old roofs, TIV by state
General liabilityRevenueOperations, contracts, the loss ratio and the largest loss
Commercial autoVehicles, driversDriver counts against vehicles, radius, the loss frequency
Workers compensationPayroll, employeesClass codes, open claims, experience
Umbrella / excessRevenueThe primaries underneath, fleet and premises exposures
CyberRevenue, personal records heldControls, records, incidents
Management liabilityRevenue, employeesFinancials, claims history, employment practices

These are exactly the exposures InsightPlacement’s exposure engine asks for per line, and a missing one is marked against the line that needs it.

The six questions every SOV draws

  1. What is the construction class of this building?
  2. When was it built?
  3. Is it sprinklered?
  4. What is the building value? (Not just a TIV.)
  5. Why doesn’t building + contents + business income equal the TIV on this row?
  6. How old is the roof?

A schedule that answers these on every row draws no questions. One that misses them on one row in ten draws a list of questions and, usually, a more conservative price.

Losses: five years, every line, fresh

Underwriters want five years of losses per line — claims, incurred, paid, open, the largest single loss — valued recently. A loss run valued more than about 90 days before submission reads as stale; a line with no loss run reads as a line with something to hide. The loss ratio against the expiring premium is the first number they compute.

flowchart LR A["Applicant
industry, revenue,
employees"] --> S["Market-ready
submission"] B["Exposures
this year vs last"] --> S C["Property schedule
6 checks per row"] --> S D["Loss history
5 years, fresh"] --> S E["Expiring program"] --> S S --> G["Open items,
stated by the broker"] style S fill:#e8f8f4,stroke:#10b981,stroke-width:2px

State the gaps

Nearly every submission has something missing at the moment it must go. The difference between a good one and a weak one is whether the broker says so. InsightPlacement’s submission package ends with an Open items section listing every gap by area — the drivers not collected, the location without a construction class — and the submission builder will not propose approving a version while a high-severity item is open at the data-collection stage.

Placement Workspace · Exposures, loss runs, SOV
Exposures, loss runs, the statement of values and the expiring program, on illustrative data
The data behind readiness (illustrative): this year’s exposures against last year’s with drivers not collected, loss runs by line and status, the SOV with 2 of 9 locations carrying gaps, and the expiring program.

For how this works step by step, see building the market-ready submission and cleaning up the SOV and the exposures.

Keep reading